Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4498

Investing - Theory, News & General • Aggressive Asset Allocation?

Folks,

It turns out there is no such consistent view on what is an aggressive asset allocation. And, what does aggressive actually mean?

1) Person A is 100% stock with zero emergency fund. But, all retirement expense is funded by pension and social security. So, is person A aggressive in asset allocation? Person A is not taking any risk or impact to his lifestyle even if the portfolio goes to zero.

2) Person B is 100% stock with zero emergency fund. The retirement expense is to be 100% funded by the portfolio. But, the portfolio is 100X aka 100 years of expense. Is person B having an aggressive asset allocation? Not exactly. The person's portfolio is so big that even if the stock market drops 50% and more, it won't impact the lifestyle.

3) Person C is 100% stock with zero emergency fund. But, the person's real estate portfolio is 2X the stock portfolio and his retirement is funded by rental income. Is person C having an aggressive asset allocation?

It seems to me that without the total context/financial picture of the person and how the expenses are funded, it is very hard to say every X% stock portfolio is aggressive or not.

What do you mean by an aggressive portfolio?

KlangFool

Statistics: Posted by KlangFool — Fri Jan 10, 2025 12:16 pm — Replies 4 — Views 300



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4498

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>